Bartko Pavia LLP
  • About
    • Locations
  • Services
    • Practices
    • Industries
  • Professionals
  • Insights & News
    • Events
    • Honors & Awards
    • Media Mentions
    • Press Releases
    • Publications
    • Speaking Engagements
  • Careers

COVID-19 Laws and Regulations Update For 2021

  1. | Home
  2. | Insights & News
  3. | Publications
  • Print
  • PDF
    Share this page

Publications

06, May 2020

By: Kerry L. Duffy and Elizabeth “Lisa” T. Ferguson

In a surprising turn of events this week, Congress did not extend the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”) past December 31, 2020.  This means that employers will not be required to provide FFCRA leave in 2021.  Rather, employers have the option of voluntarily providing FFCRA leave past the expiration date, in which case they may continue to take advantage of FFCRA tax credits through March 31, 2021 for qualifying FFCRA leave.  There is no change to the amount of leave available to employees – meaning, if an employer chooses to offer FFCRA leave into 2021, but an employee has already exhausted their FFCRA leave in 2020, that employee is not eligible for any additional FFCRA leave.  Please also be aware that California’s Supplemental Paid Sick Leave Act (“CSPSL”) is also set to expire on December 31, 2020 because its deadline is tied to that of the FFCRA.  However, any employee who is on CSPSL leave as of December 31 is permitted to take their full leave, even if this would cause the CSPSL leave to extend past the expiration date.  Employers who elect not to extend FFCRA leave into 2021 should remove any employee notice posters regarding that leave (or if applicable, the notice poster for CSPSL leave), update any written policies, and communicate these policy changes to employees.

Other COVID-19 related laws and regulations continue to be in effect, and it is important for employers to be in compliance.  For instance, employers must comply with the Cal/OSHA COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standards (“Standards”), which took effect on November 30, 2020 and created reporting, recording, and notice requirements relating to COVID-19.  The Standards apply to all California employers with three exceptions: (1) Workplaces where there is only one employee who does not have contact with other people; (2) Employees who are working from home; and (3) Employees who are covered by the Aerosol Transmissible Diseases regulation.

Under these Standards, employers must have a written COVID-19 Prevention Program (“CPP”) as a standalone policy or as part of an existing Injury and Illness Prevention Program, which must include:

  • Identifying and evaluating employee exposures to COVID-19 health hazards.
  • Implementing effective policies and procedures to correct unsafe and unhealthy conditions (such as safe physical distancing, modifying the workplace, and staggering work schedules).
  • Providing and ensuring workers wear face coverings to prevent exposure in the workplace.
  • Investigating and responding to COVID-19 cases, and offering free testing to employees exposed to COVID-19 at the workplace.
  • Providing training and instruction to employees on how COVID-19 is spread and infection prevention techniques.
  • Excluding employees with COVID-19 exposure from the workplace for 14 days.
  • Providing information regarding COVID-19-related benefits that affected employees may be entitled to under applicable federal, state, or local laws.
  • Establishing a system for communicating how employees should report COVID-19 symptoms and possible hazards, available accommodations for employees who are at greater risk for severe illness, and information about testing.
  • Providing paid leave to employees excluded from the workplace due to a workplace exposure (where the employee is otherwise able to work and cannot work from home while quarantining, subject to offset for other benefits).
  • Reporting information about COVID-19 cases at the workplace to the local health department and Cal/OSHA when certain infection thresholds are met.
  • Maintaining a record of COVID-19 cases that removes personal identifying information that shall be made available for review to employees, authorized employee representatives, or as otherwise required by law.
  • Establishing return to work criteria for employees excluded from the worksite due to COVID-19.

A model CPP drafted by Cal/OSHA is available in English and Spanish.

In addition, California employers must comply with AB 685 requirements, which go into effect on January 1, 2021.  Of particular note, employers must provide a written notice to all employees, the employers of subcontracted employees, and union representatives of employees who were on the premises at the same worksite as a person who was infected with COVID-19 or who was subject to a COVID-19-related quarantine order.  This written notice must be issued within one business day of the employer becoming aware of the potential exposure and should not include any information that would identify the person at the worksite with COVID-19.  The notice must include information about any COVID-19-related benefits to which the employee may be entitled, disinfection and safety plans to be implemented, and advise as to anti-retaliation and anti-discrimination protections for disclosing a positive COVID-19 test or diagnosis or order to quarantine or isolate.

There are also local COVID-19 paid sick leave ordinances that may impact employers depending on locality, so it is important to check for any that may apply.  Given the complexities of these and other COVID-19 laws and regulations, employers are recommended to consult with employment counsel on these matters.

Related Services

  • Labor & Employment

Related Professionals

Kerry L. Duffy

Kerry L. Duffy

Partner

Email

415.956.1900

Insights & News

Press Release

30, October 2025

An Ruda Serves as Judge at the Berkeley Female Founders & Funders Summit

Learn more

Honors and Awards

17, May 2023

Patrick M. Ryan Ranked Top IP Lawyer

Learn more

Media Mentions

27, October 2025

Steve Vieux Featured in Law360 Coverage of the California Lawyers Association’s Golden State Institute

Learn more

Press Release

17, December 2025

Bartko Pavia Elevates Four Attorneys to Partnership

Learn more

Honors and Awards

26, November 2025

Patrick M. Ryan Named to Daily Journal’s 2025 “Top Antitrust Lawyers” List

Learn more

Honors and Awards

23, September 2025

Patrick M. Ryan Earns Repeat Recognition as 2025 Top 100 Lawyer

Learn more

Media Mentions

30, May 2025

Zest Labs $222M Verdict Gains Widespread Media Coverage

Learn more

Honors and Awards

01, January 2025

Bartko Pavia Earns Recognition in 2025 Best Law Firms® Rankings

Learn more

Press Release

31, May 2019

Bartko Pavia Firm Obtains $845,114,000 Judgment for ASML Against XTAL, Inc.

Learn more

Press Release

01, August 2025

Bartko Pavia Continues Strategic Expansion with Addition of Antitrust Partner Ian Papendick

Learn more

Media Mentions

05, February 2024

Bartko Pavia Obtains Defense Win in Uber Trade Secret Case

Learn more

Honors and Awards

24, January 2024

Patrick M. Ryan Named Leading Commercial Litigator

Learn more

Press Release

14, May 2025

Bartko Pavia’s Patrick M. Ryan obtains $222 million jury verdict against Walmart

Learn more

Honors and Awards

08, November 2023

Bartko Pavia Ranked Top Litigation Boutique

Learn more

Press Release

11, March 2022

Bartko Pavia Scores Huge Defense Jury Verdict in $411 Million Sutter Health Antitrust Class Action

Learn more

Press Release

07, February 2023

Bartko Pavia Clients Win $680 Million Francesca Naify Case

Learn more

Press Release

30, October 2025

An Ruda Serves as Judge at the Berkeley Female Founders & Funders Summit

Learn more

Honors and Awards

17, May 2023

Patrick M. Ryan Ranked Top IP Lawyer

Learn more

Media Mentions

27, October 2025

Steve Vieux Featured in Law360 Coverage of the California Lawyers Association’s Golden State Institute

Learn more

Press Release

17, December 2025

Bartko Pavia Elevates Four Attorneys to Partnership

Learn more

Honors and Awards

26, November 2025

Patrick M. Ryan Named to Daily Journal’s 2025 “Top Antitrust Lawyers” List

Learn more

Honors and Awards

23, September 2025

Patrick M. Ryan Earns Repeat Recognition as 2025 Top 100 Lawyer

Learn more

Media Mentions

30, May 2025

Zest Labs $222M Verdict Gains Widespread Media Coverage

Learn more

Honors and Awards

01, January 2025

Bartko Pavia Earns Recognition in 2025 Best Law Firms® Rankings

Learn more

Press Release

31, May 2019

Bartko Pavia Firm Obtains $845,114,000 Judgment for ASML Against XTAL, Inc.

Learn more

Press Release

01, August 2025

Bartko Pavia Continues Strategic Expansion with Addition of Antitrust Partner Ian Papendick

Learn more

Media Mentions

05, February 2024

Bartko Pavia Obtains Defense Win in Uber Trade Secret Case

Learn more

Honors and Awards

24, January 2024

Patrick M. Ryan Named Leading Commercial Litigator

Learn more

Press Release

14, May 2025

Bartko Pavia’s Patrick M. Ryan obtains $222 million jury verdict against Walmart

Learn more

Honors and Awards

08, November 2023

Bartko Pavia Ranked Top Litigation Boutique

Learn more

Press Release

11, March 2022

Bartko Pavia Scores Huge Defense Jury Verdict in $411 Million Sutter Health Antitrust Class Action

Learn more

Press Release

07, February 2023

Bartko Pavia Clients Win $680 Million Francesca Naify Case

Learn more

Press Release

30, October 2025

An Ruda Serves as Judge at the Berkeley Female Founders & Funders Summit

Learn more

Honors and Awards

17, May 2023

Patrick M. Ryan Ranked Top IP Lawyer

Learn more

Media Mentions

27, October 2025

Steve Vieux Featured in Law360 Coverage of the California Lawyers Association’s Golden State Institute

Learn more

View all Insights

Bartko Pavia LLP
  • About
  • Services
  • Professionals
  • Insights & News
  • Careers

© 2025 Bartko Pavia LLP | All Rights Reserved

  • Make Payment: LawPay
  • Disclaimers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Attorney Advertising
  • Cookie Settings