Tyler M. Cunningham

• Alaska Air Group, Inc. et al. v. Anthem, Inc. et al., 2:21-cv-01209 (N.D. Ala.) and JetBlue Airways Corp. et al. v. Anthem at al., 2:22-00558 (N.D. Ala.) Represents several businesses that opted out of a class settlement with the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association and its member insurance companies.  Plaintiffs allege defendants engaged in an illegal market and customer allocation in violation of the Sherman Act.
• Sidibe v. Sutter Health, Case No. 3:12-CV-04854-LB (N.D. Cal.) Represented a large healthcare provider in parallel federal and state class actions that alleged tying and market leveraging. Worked on all aspects of party, third-party, and expert discovery, motion practice, and trial preparation in a case that ultimately resulted in a complete defense verdict.
• In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig., MDL No. 1917 (N.D. Cal.) Defended industry-leading multinational electronics companies in price-fixing class actions, individual plaintiff actions, and state attorney general actions regarding cathode ray tube products.
• In re Flash Memory Antitrust Litig., MDL No. 1852 (N.D. Cal.) Defended global electronics companies in consolidated class actions and individual actions alleging price-fixing of flash memory products.
• In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litig., MDL No. 1827 (N.D. Cal.) As counsel to international electronics companies, defended private and governmental price-fixing actions concerning thin film transistor liquid crystal display products.
• In re Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litig., MDL No. 1819 (N.D. Cal.) Defended global technology manufacturer in civil price-fixing class actions regarding static random access memory chip products.
• In re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litig., MDL No. 1486 (N.D. Cal.) Defended civil price-fixing and government enforcement actions regarding dynamic random access memory chip products.
• In re Credit/Debit Card Tying Cases, Cal. Jud. Council Coord. Proc. No. 4335 (San Francisco Superior Court) Represented international payment-processing company in coordinated class actions and related settlement appeals concerning alleged payment card tying and network exclusionary practices.
• Rambus Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc., et al. (San Francisco Superior Court) Antitrust counsel for global electronics company defending IP-related antitrust claims in multibillion dollar litigation with Rambus, coordinating with patent counsel in related proceedings.
• Reilly v. MediaNews Group, Inc. et al., Case No. 06-cv-04332-SI (N.D. Cal.)As counsel for leading media company, blocked private antitrust challenge to acquisition of Contra Costa Times and San Jose Mercury News.

California Supreme Court Resolves Split Over Accrual Rules for Unfair Competition Claims 

Grocers' Revenue-Sharing Deal Deserves More Than a Quick Look, Ninth Circuit Holds

NFL Fans - Are You Ready for Some... Antitrust Litigation? Players Sue, Claiming Lockout is a Group Boycott

Kansas Supreme Court Declares “Rule of Reason” Inapplicable to Kansas Antitrust Law; Legislature May Have a Different Idea*